For many people, the story of evolution removes God from the equation of life, concluding if there is a naturalistic, scientific way to account for the universe and everything in it, then God’s law is irrelevant. However, if we are simply evolved animals, how does morality apply at all? If “Thou shalt not kill” applies to humans, the question now becomes, “How human?” Social Darwinism, consistently applied, has been detrimental to society on many levels. If certain people groups are more advanced than others, and God’s moral law need not apply, under what logical premise can evolutionists argue for or against absolute morality?
Up Next in Origins
-
S1E7 Freakshow: Regaining God's Image
Racist ideology, lack of compassion for the elderly, infirm, and unborn- and dissolution of traditional marriage, family, and human identity are rooted in an evolutionary interpretation of human anthropology. Humanity has grown comfortable seeing mankind as a civilized animal with bestial roots t...
-
Homo Habilis: Evidence for Evolution ...
Natural History Museums everywhere display line-ups of ape-to-human icons that supposedly show how humans evolved from ape-like creatures millions of years ago. One step in this line up is Homo habilis. This icon is not represented by a single complete skeleton and has only about 100 bones assign...
-
Homo Habilis: Evidence for Evolution ...
Natural History Museums everywhere display line-ups of ape-to-human icons that supposedly show how humans evolved from ape-like creatures millions of years ago. One step in this line up is Homo habilis. This icon is not represented by a single complete skeleton and has only about 100 bones assign...
2 Comments